<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad App Pricing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitbq.com/blog/2010/02/19/ipad-app-pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitbq.com/blog/2010/02/19/ipad-app-pricing/</link>
	<description>News fresh from the grill</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:25:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Tufnel</title>
		<link>http://bitbq.com/blog/2010/02/19/ipad-app-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Tufnel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbq.com/blog/?p=43#comment-71</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s another option you missed too: separate iPhone and iPod app stores (and you can start fresh with the iPad app store, using a different model and different presentation). This comes with its own issues, but solves more problems than it creates IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s another option you missed too: separate iPhone and iPod app stores (and you can start fresh with the iPad app store, using a different model and different presentation). This comes with its own issues, but solves more problems than it creates IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shazron</title>
		<link>http://bitbq.com/blog/2010/02/19/ipad-app-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Shazron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbq.com/blog/?p=43#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Martin&#039;s suggestion is a great idea! &quot;buy the iPad version, get the iPhone version free&quot;, for universal apps. This situation is similar to what certain apps that have a Mac OS X version plus an iPhone version - there is no way to tie purchase of the desktop version and get the iPhone version free. With universal apps, this will be possible (your &quot;desktop&quot; is the iPad now).

Come to think of it, it can be truly &quot;universal&quot;. Have the iPhone, iPad, and OS X versions all in one bundle. With the shared documents feature of the iPad, the iPad can share the .app of the OS X version for the user to download (serial distribution will be another matter entirely that needs to be solved in this scenario).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin&#8217;s suggestion is a great idea! &#8220;buy the iPad version, get the iPhone version free&#8221;, for universal apps. This situation is similar to what certain apps that have a Mac OS X version plus an iPhone version &#8211; there is no way to tie purchase of the desktop version and get the iPhone version free. With universal apps, this will be possible (your &#8220;desktop&#8221; is the iPad now).</p>
<p>Come to think of it, it can be truly &#8220;universal&#8221;. Have the iPhone, iPad, and OS X versions all in one bundle. With the shared documents feature of the iPad, the iPad can share the .app of the OS X version for the user to download (serial distribution will be another matter entirely that needs to be solved in this scenario).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacMotives</title>
		<link>http://bitbq.com/blog/2010/02/19/ipad-app-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>MacMotives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbq.com/blog/?p=43#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I like Martin&#039;s idea.   It&#039;d be even better if developers standardized around the same nomenclature for the Universal apps.  I guess they could just append something like  Cinderapp Universal or whatever.  So that iPad user automatically knew that the Universal apps covered both devices and wouldn&#039;t complain (hopefully) over a small premium. 

I think iPad users are going to be different than iPhone/iPod Touch users.  The iPad is going launch at a much higher price for much more functionality and iPad users will shift their expectations up accordingly which means many will accept higher pricing IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Martin&#8217;s idea.   It&#8217;d be even better if developers standardized around the same nomenclature for the Universal apps.  I guess they could just append something like  Cinderapp Universal or whatever.  So that iPad user automatically knew that the Universal apps covered both devices and wouldn&#8217;t complain (hopefully) over a small premium. </p>
<p>I think iPad users are going to be different than iPhone/iPod Touch users.  The iPad is going launch at a much higher price for much more functionality and iPad users will shift their expectations up accordingly which means many will accept higher pricing IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Pilkington</title>
		<link>http://bitbq.com/blog/2010/02/19/ipad-app-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Pilkington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbq.com/blog/?p=43#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Another option you&#039;ve missed off is to have two versions: 1 for iPhone, 1 Universal. You can then market the Universal one as &quot;buy the iPad version, get the iPhone version free&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another option you&#8217;ve missed off is to have two versions: 1 for iPhone, 1 Universal. You can then market the Universal one as &#8220;buy the iPad version, get the iPhone version free&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

